Reviewers Policies

Reviewers Policies:

Peer Reviewers

Should be aware of the manuscripts submitted are privileged communications and should be treated confidentially.

Should provide their recommendations of the strengths and weaknesses of an article in written form as well as a report generated by Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & Surgery.

They should direct their attention in advancing the report of their review, recognizing the most relevant, and the best quality material for the journal.

Those who are active members of the journal should meet their minimum standards about their background qualification in original research, the number of publications, training in editing manuscripts if any, and earlier finest appraisals for manuscripts.

Should be an expert in the field of science addressed in the manuscripts they review, selection should be done based on their expertise, objectivity, and knowledge in scientific research.

Reviewers are expected to be professional, fair & transparent, courteous, prompt and positive.

The expected elements of a quality peer-review that should be followed by a reviewer are as follows:

• We Should identify and comment on the strengths and weaknesses of the design of research and its methodology
• We should comment accurately on the quality of the authors' research findings, acknowledging its limitations and responsible for the constructive representation of research analytics.
• We should provide written notice on the major strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript, independent of the research methodology, results, and representation of study and design.
• We should recommend authors with valuable suggestions for improving his/her manuscripts.
• Should comment on ethical concerns, accompanied to the research, or any potential evidence of scientific misconduct
• Recommendations should be objective, fair and professional
• The review should help the editor with the necessary details to make decisions on the manuscript's acceptance.

Reviewers are asked not to share with colleagues the manuscripts assigned to them without prior permission of the editor.

Reviewers should not make any misuse of research findings, data, or interpretations of their personal or academic use before publication without any author’s prior permission or are stating their use as editorials, commentaries to assort the article.